Whats your opinion for leggings as pants? Too riskee or okay? I'm not quite sure.
As long as there not see through, i think there fine!!
yeah as long as thier... solid.. i suppose its ok..but i think it looks alitle.. eh i don't like seeing people (girls OR guuys yeah....) doing it... i'm just like i don't want to see.. alll that. Like under a short dress... it's cute, but as pants... like in place of.. jeans or sweats... :& nah.. idk i htink it looks.. icky. lol
I don't think it's modest.
i think that wearing leggings is only appropriate when the top that you are wearing covers your butt. ie. i have a dress that is a little bit sorter than i like it, so i put on leggings to cover the extra space.
I agree with katie. If the shirt comes past your your bottom or about finger tip length then it's ok but not above. then it just looks bad and unmodest
I dont like it - I think leggings are a great way to make a short skirt or dress modest, but by themselves - just as pants - 1) it looks really weird (not gonna lie - i saw this girl yesterday wearing just leggings as pants but they were like tight pleather/plasic - omg she looks like she was trying to be catwoman) 2) Im not sure that they are modest - there is just something about them being so tight - they show everything, might as well have just worn your underwear Of course I dont want to be judgmental either - its kinda a preference thing too - you know if when you put it on you feel conviction from the Holy Spirit that its inappropriate (and your parents are a good determining factor too) Im not saying that I dont wear things that some people consider immodest, but just be careful as to why you want to wear just leggings as pants, and be mindful of Holy Spirit convictions :)
I agree with the others. Icky by itself. Definitely.
I agree ^
Well, I wouldn't do it! ;DBut on a serious note, I am in concurrence with what the others have said.
I don't think it's bad by itself, just... why? I just don't like the itme itself. It's like they were trying to make a t-shirt version of the jeans. That's what t-shirts are for.
I think that it is ugly.... You need to wear it with a long shirt or sweater. but with a normal tee, no way.
I wear them ONLY If my top covers my booty lol. DEFINATELY not as pants alone! No no no! I dont even think Jeggings are acceptable forms of pants.
Heres my opinion. As a guy, they make me lust, quite honestly. God says much about modesty various places in the Bible, and I don't think that they are modest. Even if they are not see-through, they are too clingy to the butt and legs and make guys' minds go to the wrong places. I like them, but for the wrong reasons. 1 Timothy 2:9-10. Grace and peace
I am a man therefore I wear no leggings........on a more serious note as long as something else is worn overtop I see no problem with it
I don't think leggings should be used as an excuse to wear something less modest than you would normally consider. If you wouldn't normally wear a shirt that just covers your behind with no pants/shorts, then I don't think you should wear that same shirt with just leggings. Same goes for super short skirts. If you wouldn't wear it without leggings, it isn't appropriate with leggings.
^Very Good Advice^If you question it, then just don't wear it. Unless you think its ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY. (which is unlikely lol)I know a lot of girls dress to impress (saying saying you do or anything like that, so don't get me wrong) but if ya;ll are trying to impress a guy, be modest. Cause nothing is more impressive than a girl who dresses to impress God, rather than others. ANYWHO! now I'm off on a tangent!Vanessas ^above^ advise is very good.
I agree, Vanessa. Just because it covers doesn't mean it's modest. No,I don't think legging are modest by themselves. Plus, they look gross to me. ;)
Well, I think JayB said it. If a guy says it causes him to struggle, don`t do it. It`s an iffy situation on it`s own, but if you get a report that it`s a temptation, it`s best to stay away from it.